Prediction of Roscoe Tanner vs Mark Edmondson Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanner vs M. Edmondson

Roscoe Tanner
USA
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
2
Win
4
Played
2
Win
74
Age
71
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
4
Best Rank
15
2
Total Titles
3
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Mark Edmondson
AUS
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
2
Win
4
Played
2
Win
74
Age
71
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
4
Best Rank
15
2
Total Titles
3
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Tanner 2 - 2 Edmondson
They have played 11 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 6 and Mark Edmondson winning 5. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Mark Edmondson was at the Davis Cup WG SF: USA vs AUS, 02-10-1981, Round: Robin, Surface: Carpet, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tanner | 2 |
| Edmondson | 2 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(Robin) Davis Cup WG SF: USA vs AUS(10-02-81)
Roscoe Tanner
4
6
6
Mark Edmondson
6
2
3
(F) Bristol(06-13-81)
Mark Edmondson
6
5
6
Roscoe Tanner
3
7
4
(QF) Hong Kong(11-05-79)
Roscoe Tanner
6
6
Mark Edmondson
2
4
R. Tanner vs M. Edmondson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 66.67% (604-302) | Career Total W/L | 51.57% (263-247) |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 17 | Titles | 6 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Tanner vs M. Edmondson Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mark Edmondson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roscoe Tanner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mark Edmondson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mark Edmondson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mark Edmondson winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 116/42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/59). Mark Edmondson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 111/63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 64/81).
- Player level: In the last year, Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mark Edmondson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Roscoe Tanner winning 2 times and Mark Edmondson being victorious 2 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 6 and Mark Edmondson winning 5.
- The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Mark Edmondson was at the Davis Cup WG SF: USA vs AUS, 02-10-1981, Round: Robin, Surface: Carpet, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Roscoe Tanner and Mark Edmondson have played a deciding set 3 times, with Roscoe Tanner winning 1 times and Mark Edmondson 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roscoe Tanner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mark Edmondson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mark Edmondson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mark Edmondson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Roscoe Tanner vs Mark Edmondson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Tanner vs M. Edmondson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 54 | Games Won | 50 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 50% (2/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Tanner 0%, Edmondson 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tanner 0%, Edmondson 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Tanner 0%, Edmondson 0%.
R. Tanner Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-7 6-4 | ||
R3 | L | 6-4 7-6 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R3 | L | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | ||
M. Edmondson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | W | 6-4 4-6 4-6 7-5 9-7 | ||
R3 | L | 6-2 6-1 7-6 | ||
R3 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R4 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||

R. Tanner vs M. Edmondson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.67% (604/302) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.59% (260/244) |
| 63.03% (1439/844) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.37% (673/637) |
| 54.41% (12342/10342) | Games Win/Loss | 50.25% (6306/6243) |
| 66.98% (215/106) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.30% (50/58) |
| 62.42% (98/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.14% (64/81) |
| 64.66% (161/88) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (35/42) |
| 73.42% (116/42) | Grass Win/Loss | 63.79% (111/63) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 549.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 589.89 |
| 73.17% (90/33) | Slam W/L | 53.66% (44/38) |
| 54.39% (31/26) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (8/16) |
| 69.23% (9/4) | Cups W/L | 61.11% (11/7) |
| 66.48% (474/239) | Main Tour W/L | 51.72% (195/182) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 67% (505/759) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (204/406) |
| 67% (90/134) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (54/95) |
| 39% (15/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 56% (161/288) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (83/161) |
| 86% (596/514) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (248/206) |
| 14% (596/82) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (248/42) |
| 28% (299/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (254/52) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:33 PM 18/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:35
H2H 0-0
13:12
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal